TimestampCompare

About TimestampCompare

TimestampCompare is an independent benchmark project helping B2B buyers, CTOs, compliance officers, and legal teams evaluate timestamping providers with transparent, evidence-based scoring.

🔬

Research scope

We track timestamping authorities globally, from major enterprise providers to regional specialists and community projects, covering both eIDAS-qualified and non-qualified services.

📊

Scoring model

Weighted across 5 categories: Security & Compliance (37%), Expertise & Focus (20%), API & Developer (18%), Features & Usability (17%), and Pricing (8%). Dynamic weighting on the scoring page lets you reprioritize.

📅

Update cadence

We refresh benchmark inputs quarterly and re-score providers whenever material service changes are confirmed by vendor announcements or trust list updates.

⚖️

Neutrality pledge

TimestampCompare does not accept paid placements, affiliate commissions, or sponsored content. Rankings reflect independently verified criteria only.

Key timestamping features compared

Each feature is scored based on publicly available information — provider websites, documentation, and certification pages. Where data is not disclosed, the criterion is left unscored rather than guessed. Use the free buyer checklist below to ask providers directly about any undisclosed points.

🔒

Security & Compliance

37% of the score. Covers eIDAS qualification, ISO 27001, archive timestamping, sealing capability, and eIDAS qualification seniority.

API & Developer Experience

20% of the score. Evaluated on API availability, sandbox environment, developer documentation quality, public status monitoring and recent outage history.

💰

Pricing & Commercial

20% of the score. Assesses recurring maintenance fees and setup costs (inverted: lower fees = better score). Negative review rates are informational.

🖥️

Features & Usability

20% of the score. Reviews admin interface availability, manual timestamping capability and AI readiness.

🎯

Expertise & Focus

20% of the score. The sole weighted criterion is an identified operational team. Primary focus, published timestamping articles and eIDAS qualification year are informational only.

Non-public data? Download the buyer template

Providers rarely publish pricing, performance SLAs, or capacity figures. Use our free due-diligence grid to ask them directly during your evaluation.

Download template (CSV) →